
Gazzetta.it front page
1. First Impressions
The first impression is two-fold.
Firstly, the site is visually cluttered. The very top has links to a number of Italian media outlets, then the Banner with a number of navigation tools, and then the first story.
Secondly, the colour scheme revolves mainly around the colour pink.
This is important, as La Gazzetta is the only pink newspaper in the country, instantly recognizable and highly valued as a source of information on all sports (though mostly football).
The fact that the colour scheme has carried through evokes the same trust in the website.
It’s been pointed out that there are too many shades of pink, and that the grey and orange links (multimedia and text, respectively) don’t match, but personally I find the colours work well with each other, despite perhaps not being all coherent.
There are a lot of links on the page, but and while they look cluttered and thick, they are also consistently organised.
There is not that much free space and a lot of text, unlike award-winning sites like Flickr and Facebook.
While there is a certain amount of multimedia and live feeds on the right, the right hand side of the very long page is cluttered by ads and links to things, like online games, far removed from Gazzetta’s normal beat.
2. Writing
The front page does follow Nielsen’s “F-rule”, the first story and live feed taking up the upper part of the F, the second most important section (a toolbar on all Italian serie A football teams) located on the second “F” and all the stories placed vertically on the left.
The writing is exceptional, as La Gazzetta only hires the best sports writers in the country, of whom there are plenty. However, it is not structured very well. There are subtitles, but no paragraphs, so articles look like they are four different walls of text.
The first paragraph is indeed bold, and there is a picture after it, but it does not follow the F-shape suggested by Nielsen.
The whole lay-out of single articles is very vertical, dense and requires a lot of scrolling, and this should be changed to allow for easier reading.

An article page within Gazzetta.it
There are no links within the articles themselves, but there is a bar on the left with links related to the story.
The vast majority of links are internal, but then, the website is so famous in Italy it need not link out to up its google rank.
I doubt anyone even looks for La Gazzetta on google, as everyone knows what the url is.
3. Content
There is plenty of space dedicated to multimedia on the website.
There is a link on the right to La Gazzetta’s own online TV service (which doesn’t have a broadcast equivalent) with a useful toolbar with a wide variety of videos to watch, from football round-ups to interviews to gossip.
The content is mainly based around football and only superficially cover most other sports, but there are many multimedia contributions.
La Gazzetta has many exclusive interviews, and often hosts videochats with sport personalities when users can type in questions and the interviewee can answer live.
Blogs are present, but they are fairly hard to find and are not a major selling point of the website.
On Sundays, or during important games, La Gazzetta has a live minute-by-minute coverage page for every game played, with plenty of statistics, round-ups and comments.

The live-coverage page during a serie A game
They cannot show live video due to broadcasting rights, but for many football gans, especially abroad, this is the next best thing.
Users are allowed to comment, but the commenting format does not encourage one to read through all the posts.
There is also a section to the website entirely in English, a direct translation of all the best articles on the site.
Ultimately, La Gazzetta is the best source for information on Italian sports, unrivalled in its accuracy and scope of coverage, especially in football.
4. Navigation
The navigation is consistent throughout the website, but also consistently disorganized and clunky.
At the top of the front page is a number of drop down menus with their own sub-menus which, while intuitive, are so large and take up so much space that navigating on them covers a great deal of the headlines below.
Within article pages, navigation is quite handy.
On the right is a toolbar with links to related stories, both background pieces and “other side of the coin” pieces, and links going back to the sports game or event mentioned in the story.
Also on this toolbar, which isn’t present on the main website, are a list of the most read articles in the last day, week and month.
This is a great tool, and I fail to see why it isn’t included in all pages, much like timesonline.co.uk.
The front page does have a rolling “latest news” section, but that is actually below the fold, as are all the articles apart from the headlining one.
On the right, the button which takes to a list of games being covered minute-by-minute is constantly present.
This is good because it is the first feature many users will look for, and it’s in the F-shape advocated by Nielsen, but it is useless when there are no games being covered.
Conclusion: The website is well designed, but badly organised. Good designs, colour schemes and excellent news and multimedia initiatives are all good in themselves, but they need to be reshuffled and reorganized for optimum use.



















