The ban on cigarette vending machines is facing a turn out. Two new measures – the end of the vending machines and hiding the brand and logos on cigarette boxes- are set to be ditched this week, according to Metro newspaper.
Among the people interviewed, many think that it won’t make a difference anyway. Helga Bastianello, 33-year-old who doesn’t smoke thinks, “If people want to smoke, they will smoke. It is not this kind of bans that will stop them”.
Backbenchers and trade groups have put a lot of pressure to reverse the ban. This led to a change of direction in the House of Commons. The reason for that: little evidence to show that those steps would have health benefits.
For many people who smoke, those type of actions wouldn’t have a positive impact. Valeria Marchetti, 29-year-old student at the University of Westminster, says, “When you are as addicted as me, covering the label doesn’t make any difference. If you want to smoke, you will smoke anyway”.
Even for the ones who don’t smoke, putting more bans wasn’t the main way of helping people to quit. “Covering the label is a ridiculous idea. It is a restriction to the consumer choice, in my opinion,” explains 21-year-old Alberto Furlan.
“Vending machines should be banned”
As far as the vending machines are concerned, even some of the smokers think that it would have been a good idea to put an end to them. According to Valeria Marchetti, “It could help people to quit smoking because it is less opportunities for smokers to buy cigarettes”.
Vending cigarettes machines is an easy way to encourage the under 21s to buy cigarettes. Therefore, many believe that preventing those machines from operating helps protect their health.
21-year-old Amo Shah claims, “How can you check people’s age when buying from a machine? I think they should definitely stop the use of those machines, I am not a big fan of them”.
Nowadays, most of the Governments in Europe are taking even more severe actions regarding the smoking issue. One of the last measures to deal with this public health problem was to insert really shocking images on the boxes.
Yet, not every one agrees regarding this action. Amo Shah, staff at the University of Westminster considers this measure as being “an attempt to influence someone’s decision too much”
Alberto Furlan thinks, “Images are more shocking than words. It is not the first time that such a thing is done and I am almost sure that it worked in other countries”.




Internet problems plaguing 


